Documentation CI/CD
Merged pull requests, issue tracker tickets (e.g. Jira), team chat requests (e.g. Slack) and support questions become reviewed drafts inside the knowledge base you already run. Built for technical writers and PMs who are tired of docs trailing the release.
AI drafts. Human approves. Nothing publishes without you.
Add scoped, expiring API tokens
User-facing change detected. Diff and linked PRD pulled in as context.
Create and scope API tokens
Create and scope API tokens
See it run
Recorded on the live engine. On-screen captions carry the story, so no sound needed.
A ticket lands in the issue tracker (e.g. Jira). Under a minute later, a scored draft waits for review.
Support asks in team chat (e.g. Slack). A ticket opens itself, and the draft follows, open questions included.
A limit changes from 100 to 500. The live article stays untouched until a human approves, then two related pages get flagged as stale.
Shown with Zendesk Guide. The same run writes to the knowledge base you already use, or to HTML, Markdown and XML.
How it works
01 · Signal
A PR merges to main. A ticket moves in your issue tracker (e.g. Jira). Someone asks in team chat (e.g. Slack). Draft Punk listens to all of it and ignores what customers never see, with a logged reason for every skip.
02 · Draft
Written from the diff, the ticket, and the linked spec, in your house style. Existing articles are updated as a staged copy. New ones land unpublished.
03 · Approve
Move the ticket to Approved and the live article is patched in place. Same URL, same title. Until then, customers see exactly what they saw yesterday.
Product
NEW
Merge to main and the draft starts. The PR diff and changed files become context, so the draft describes what actually shipped.
Draft Punk comments on the PR with a link to the draft. Engineers see their change documented without opening the knowledge base.
Updates are staged as a separate unpublished copy. Approval patches the original in place. No broken links, no duplicate titles, no SEO reset.
One change, three articles quietly wrong. After every draft, Draft Punk flags the other pages it just made stale, ranked by impact.
Every draft arrives scored out of 10 with a checklist of anything unverified. Screenshots that need a human are marked.
Release notes compiled from what actually shipped. Repeated support questions turned into self-serve answers before the sixth reply.
PlatformComing Q4 2026
One engine for the whole documentation lifecycle, running inside the tools your team already uses.
No teken? Ain baya.
Hiring is frozen. The backlog isn't. Draft Punk gives the writer you already have the output of a team.
Security
Drafts are written straight into your knowledge base. Nothing hosted or mirrored elsewhere.
Each client runs on its own deployment. No shared data, no co-mingling.
Scoped, revocable tokens. Read-only wherever reading is enough.
Every draft is unpublished until a named human approves it. There is nothing to misconfigure.
Content sent for drafting is not retained for training.
Every draft links to the PR or ticket that triggered it, and to whoever approved it.
Managed, end to end
Software you have to set up, tune, and babysit is just another item on the backlog. Draft Punk is built, run, and tuned for you, inside your stack, by documentation people.
Triggers, outputs, and the approval flow are wired into your repos, tracker, and knowledge base during implementation. Your team configures nothing.
Your style guide, your terminology, your article patterns. Drafts sound like your docs from week one, not like a model's first guess.
Draft quality, skipped signals, and stale pages are reviewed by a senior technical writer. When something drifts, it's fixed before you notice.
Odd knowledge base, custom fields, a release process nobody else has? It gets built in, not filed as a feature request.
Tools hand you features. Draft Punk hands you the outcome: docs that ship when your code does.
Pricing
MANAGED SERVICE
Q4 OFFER
One recent release, traced from merge to help center. Then 30 days running on a live workflow in your own issue tracker and knowledge base.
No. It removes the typing and keeps the judgment with your writer. Only a human can publish.
No. Draft Punk writes into the platform you already use. Your structure, URLs, and style guide stay exactly as they are.
It is skipped, and the reason is logged. Refactors and internal changes never reach your review queue.
Usually, yes. New outputs are built during implementation. Ask on the call.
Never. There is no auto-publish path to switch on.
Thirty minutes, live, on your kind of content. No deck.